The Obama administration established what one official
is calling a "playbook" of pre-scripted actions and responses to the
last several weeks of North Korean rhetoric and provocations, that
included an increased show of U.S. military force during its annual
exercise with the South Korean military. But some of the U.S. military's
recent moves -- including the deployment of ballistic missile defenses
closer to North Korea -- were not part of the planning and instead arose
from concerns about what North Korea has planned as the U.S.-South
Korean exercise comes to an end, the administration official said.North Korea kept tensions
simmering around its borders Thursday, reportedly moving a medium-range
missile to its east coast and continuing to put pressure on a joint
industrial complex where hundreds of South Koreans work.
The day before, the
United States had announced it was sending ballistic missile defenses to
Guam, a Western Pacific territory that's home to U.S. naval and air
bases. North Korea has cited those bases among possible targets for
missile attacks.
South Korean Defense
Minister Kim Kwan-jin told a parliamentary committee in Seoul that the
North has moved a medium-range missile to its east coast for an imminent
test firing or military drill. The missile doesn't appear to be aimed
at the U.S. mainland, Kim said, according to the semi-official South
Korean news agency Yonhap.
The movement of the
missile is "of concern, certainly to the U.S. military and to Japan,"
said Mark Fitzpatrick, director of the Non-Proliferation and Disarmament
Program at the International Institute for Strategic Studies in London.
He said he believed the
missile in question was a Musudan, a missile the North hasn't tested
before that is based on a Soviet system with a range of about 2,400
kilometers (1,500 miles), far enough to reach Japan but not Guam.
The U.S. military, which
has a string of bases and thousands of troops in Japan, has already
moved two warships and a sea-based radar platform near to the Korean
Peninsula to monitor possible missile activity, U.S. defense officials
said earlier this week.
"The concerning
development is if they test a Musudan and it works, then they have a new
proven system that could reach anywhere in Japan," Fitzpatrick said.
Another worry is that the missile's test flight could pass over Japan, straining nerves in an already jittery region.
North Korea isn't believed to have an operational missile that can reach the U.S. mainland at the moment.
The medium-range missile
will probably take about two weeks to prepare, Fitzpatrick said, which
means a potential launch could coincide with the April 15 anniversary of
the the birth of Kim Il Sung, the founder of North Korea and
grandfather of its current leader, Kim Jong Un.
Known as "the Day of the
Sun," Kim Il Sung's birthday is a major public holiday in North Korea
that is usually accompanied by large-scale parades.
A fresh burst of rhetoric
The reported missile
activity Thursday followed Pyongyang's latest salvo of ominous rhetoric,
which revived the alarming but improbable threat of a nuclear attack
against the United States and warned that "the moment of explosion is
approaching fast."
The fraught situation on
the Korean Peninsula stems from the North's latest long-range rocket
launch in December and underground nuclear test in February.
The tougher U.N.
sanctions in response to those moves, combined with joint U.S.-South
Korean military exercises in the region, have prompted the regime of Kim
Jong Un to ratchet up its threats in recent weeks.
The United States has in
turn made a show of its military strength in the annual drills taking
place at the moment, flying B-2 stealth bombers capable of carrying
conventional or nuclear weapons, Cold War-era B-52s and F-22 Raptor
stealth fighters over South Korea.
But those actions have
provided fresh material for Pyongyang's rhetorical outbursts, which have
portrayed the practice flights as threats against North Korea.
"The moment of explosion
is approaching fast. No one can say a war will break out in Korea or
not and whether it will break out today or tomorrow," a spokesman for
the General Staff of the North's Korean People's Army (KPA) said early
Thursday.
"The responsibility for
this grave situation entirely rests with the U.S. administration and
military warmongers keen to encroach upon the DPRK's sovereignty and
bring down its dignified social system with brigandish logic," the KPA
spokesman said in a statement published by the state-run Korean Central
News Agency (KCNA).
DPRK is short for Democratic People's Republic of Korea, the official name for North Korea.
Doubts over nuclear capabilities
Most observers say the North is still years away from having the technology to deliver a nuclear warhead on a missile.
U.S. officials have said
they see no unusual military movements across the Demilitarized Zone
that splits the Korean Peninsula, despite weeks of bombastic rhetoric
from Pyongyang.
And many analysts say
the increasingly belligerent talk is aimed at cementing the domestic
authority of the country's young leader, Kim Jong Un.
But the North does have
plenty of conventional military firepower, including medium-range
ballistic missiles that can carry high explosives for hundreds of miles.
And U.S. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel said Wednesday that the recent
North Korean threats to Guam, Hawaii and the U.S. mainland have to be
taken seriously.
"It only takes being
wrong once, and I don't want to be the secretary of defense who was
wrong once," Hagel told an audience at Washington's National Defense
University.
But Hagel also said there was still a "responsible" path for the North to take.
"I hope the North will
ratchet this very dangerous rhetoric down," Hagel said. "There is a
pathway that is responsible for the North to get on a path to peace
working with their neighbors. There are many, many benefits to their
people that could come. But they have got to be a responsible member of
the world community, and you don't achieve that responsibility and peace
and prosperity by making nuclear threats and taking very provocative
actions."
For the time being, Pyongyang is showing little interest in taking that path.
Tensions at the border
On Thursday, it barred
South Korean workers and managers for a second day from entering the
Kaesong industrial complex, an economic cooperation zone that sits on
the North's side of the border but houses operations of scores of South
Korean companies.
It also repeated a
threat from the weekend to completely shut down the complex, where more
than 50,000 North Koreans currently work.
"If South Korea's puppet
government and conservative media continue to say bad things and make
noise, we will take firm action and pull out all of our workers from the
Kaesong industrial complex," a spokesman for the North's Committee for
the Peaceful Reunification of Korea said, according to KCNA.
The pressure Pyongyang
is putting on the companies in Kaesong is significant because the zone
is considered to be an important source of hard currency for Kim's
regime.
Analysts have said they
think it is unlikely the North would go as far as shuttering the complex
entirely, since it would be harming itself more than the South.
More than 800 South
Koreans remained inside Kaesong on Thursday morning, the South Korean
government said, with some staying longer than usual to compensate for
those the North is preventing from entering from across the border.
Pyongyang so far isn't stopping South Koreans from leaving the complex.
The North has blocked
the crossing into Kaesong before -- in March 2009, another period when
joint U.S.-South Korean military drills had upset it. It returned the
situation to normal after about a week.
The current crisis at Kaesong began a day after North Korea said it planned to restart "without delay" a reactor at its main nuclear complex that it had shut down five years ago as part of a deal with the United States, China and four other nations.
Threats 'down the road'
China, a key North
Korean ally, has expressed frustration with some of Pyongyang's recent
moves and has repeatedly called on all parties concerned to exercise
restraint.
But the North Korean military's statement Thursday didn't suggest Beijing's comments were holding much sway.
"We formally inform the
White House and Pentagon that the ever-escalating U.S. hostile policy
toward the DPRK and its reckless nuclear threat will be smashed by the
strong will of all the united service personnel and people and
cutting-edge smaller, lighter and diversified nuclear strike means of
the DPRK and that the merciless operation of its revolutionary armed
forces in this regard has been finally examined and ratified," it said.
"The U.S. had better ponder over the prevailing grave situation."
Pyongyang had already
threatened the possibility of a pre-emptive nuclear strike against the
United States and South Korea in March.
The North has conducted
three nuclear bomb tests, in 2006, 2009 and most recently in February.
It has said that its nuclear weapons are a deterrent that are no longer
up for negotiation.
Robert Carlin, a North
Korea expert at the Center for International Security and Cooperation at
Stanford University in California, said North Korea's longer-range
missiles may not be ready to be used for three to four years, and its
nuclear program is a "low-level threat" at this point.
"We're going to get out
of this particular crisis, it seems to me, without anything really
blowing up," Carlin said. "But down the road, things are going to get
more serious."
"What we should be
looking at, really, is the decisions and the policies and the approach
that we're going to have to take over the next four or five years to
deal with these things," he added. "Because for the last five years, we
really didn't do a very good job of doing that."
0 comments:
Post a Comment